Thursday, February 1, 2007

just beneath the surface (**or is it real?)...the messiness of a kingdom

I like things when they are organic. Without hype. Without show. Without any sense that I’m being sold anything. I wish there was some way to keep a church organic that still allows for growth in numbers at the same time. Maybe that is why the small group ministry is so effective when those small groups form out of their own will and desire to see God’s kingdom brought to earth. One small group starts up and then another group forms and then another, and then, all of a sudden, you begin to see this bigger picture of the kingdom of God being established on earth organically while growth is occurring. At some point, leaders may decide to interlink some of the small groups but it is only after they are firmly established with their own identity and their own passion that this decision takes place, which is what keeps it from turning manipulative or de-liberating. There is never a sense of trying to conjure up passion in the “attendees” because the passion is what draws them there in the first place.

Large administrative structures work best when a they were started and birthed out of a small group rather than small groups being birthed out of a larger administration (i.e. empty shell). Something that begun as organic will most likely never turn into something inorganic and formulaic, no matter how large it gets, it can only grow to resemble (though much more authentically) the purpose behind what the “right-off-the-bat” large administrative church is trying to do.

In the same way, something that was begun as inorganic and perfectly structured can never turn into something organic and spontaneous, it can only try to imitate it, and even then, this imitation is cheap.

I think that small groups birthed out of a larger church structure can work, as long as those within them choose to make them work but even then, this task would prove extremely difficult.

This approach to ministry allows a validity and a “real-ness”…an air of spontaneity and room for error. It allows honest, open deliberation. It allows misunderstanding, “working together” to solve the misunderstandings usually not found within a purposely large and administratively oriented church.

Maybe this is why large churches often seem like shells, where one goes and expects to find some sense of reality just beneath the big fake surface, yet finds none. (either because it was never there to begin with or it was lost in the process of getting “bigger and better” and “revamped”) Maybe this is why organic churches that somehow grow into larger things, yet still remain true to their roots are so refreshing. Because it is within this structure that one goes and finds the genuine-ness and openness and honesty right before their very eyes…so they don’t have to look for it “right beneath the surface.” It’s because these churches began with the pure desire of a few people to come together for a common goal and that desire has remained first priority.

A lot of “larger than life” churches fail because they make the aspiration to conjure up that desire in people more important than the desire itself and thus simplify it (and all its greatness) to a manipulative, in-the-box, clean, cut-and-dry ministry.

I think, at least for me, that it is out of this framework for the church that I sense the bigger things that God is doing in the world the most easily because the organic church was brought through the earth itself and not simply formed on top of it.

6 comments:

Me llamo Dave said...

does ministry happen in non organic churches? are people comeing to a relationship with christ and thier lives being changed? if so then were does that leave my organic church vs the non organic church ieals? i live a fine line of critical spirit that so often has to be kept in check. though i see so much negative, God still moves. therefore organic or non organic isn't it about God moving despite what we do? recall the story of the sheep and goats, who are seperated at the end. this would mean they were living together before the great seperation. do we seperate ourselves now, for what purpose? or do we reach out to those around us as we can now, so fewer are seperated at the end.

kate debaene said...

organic versus non-organic is a pretty touchy line. i tend to think, whether an organic community, a mega church, a church plant, a college chapel, a bible study, street evangelism, or neighborhoods of people ringing in the kingdom by the essence of who they are...as long as disciples are being made, does it really matter?

i'd be really careful to say "Small groups birthing a larger community are much more effective than a large structure birthing small groups ".

God is very creative,
and so are people, the question is substance. i wonder if the
tension you're feeling is when it smells less like
organic, spirit led new life and more like empire building. there's my 2 cents...prolly more like a whole nickel.

Me llamo Dave said...

kate smells

-the andyman- said...

good points guys. thank you for the input. kate, i definitely think that you are right in saying that that tension is that I hate when it feels like empire building and its hard just because I feel like that's so not what Jesus had in mind (i could be wrong)...but I guess if it still is changing people's lives and God is still moving, there isn't really a problem with it. I think it kind of relates to Israel's use of violence to achieve their promised land in that God used what was available at that time and worked through that to bring about a better end...and looking back it isn't really my place to state which is more effective because each can be effective to certain people.

anyways...theres my thoughts on that. you guys are great.

Jenn Swift said...

Let's have a discussion about this because I want to know what you plan on doing to bring this change about with us.

What book are you reading right now?

DBrothers said...

Thanks for the thought-provoking piece. I would like to hear more of what you are thinking through myself. I have attempted to address in my own mind some of the issues that you raise.

I know that history and sociological principles show that most organic movements start as some reformation of the establishment. For instance, the early church was a movement, the early reformation was a movement, the early pentecostal church was a movement. But then over time and as each of these movements grew, they had to institutionalize in order to preserve the advances they had made. So spiritual movements become (many times because of wonderful growth) institutions, or denominations, or large organizations. I have come to believe that this is not totally bad, unless the institution or denomination or large church loses sight of the original vision that launched it. The structures must always allow God to refresh the vision and create space for God to work in new ways.

Sorry so long - but thought I would throw some stray thoughts into the mix of stellar oommentators that have already commented....
D